by ssh on January 20, 2012
It is very rare indeed when I disagree with Seth Godin. He is a brilliant man, a best-selling author, and an insightful coach for the emerging economy, but he’s missed it on the latest announcement from Apple. I don’t blame him. It’s easy to do with all the changes that are bouncing around like a Heisenberg Uncertainty experiment.
Today, in a useful post on his Domino Project blog, he says that Apple did not just make publishing easier with their announcement of the iBooks Author application. He rightfully notes that the iBooks Author application is about authoring books, not publishing them, and there’s a difference between printing and publishing. All true.
However, the iBookstore itself is a new way to publish. In much the same way that iTunes changed publishing first for music and then for movies and TV. And the iOS App Store and then the Mac App Store changed the economics and dynamics of software publishing, so will the iBookstore change the dynamics of book publishing. The iBook Author app is the disintermediation of book creation and the iBookstore is the creation of a publishing platform designed for social discovery and long-tail economics.
Unfortunately, I think that Seth falls into a bit of myopia here due to his experience with and success in both using publishers and creating a brilliant new publisher in his Domino Project. He sounds like some of the doomsayers in the early days of iOS apps.
Publishing will never be the same. Neither will making and selling music or making and selling other creative works. Seth knows this. Perhaps the world changed publishing and Apple is simply building tools for the ride. Regardless, anyone can now create and publish a book. Selling it requires building a tribe, just like it always did, but now you get to do it on your own.
by ssh on October 8, 2011
With the passing of Steve Jobs this week juxtaposed against the announcement and release of the new iPhone 4S, the technology media have been atwitter with their views of Apple’s success or failure to continue their recent successes. In reading a wide range of such writing, it strikes me that most miss the point entirely. The reason is ironically the same reason that Apple is so successful: it’s really difficult to understand people and what they want.
Over the past few years I have spent substantial time studying direct response marketing (such as the marketing done by companies who take out those one-page ads for subglasses or the Internet marketing that offers you a free report for handing over your email address). One of the primary tenants of direct response marketing is this: it doesn’t matter what you want or what you think about those who make up your market. All the matters is what they actually want. Figure that out and you’ll be successful. In fact, your success will be in direct proportion to the accuracy of your understanding. Most technology writers and those who live their lives consumed with technology miss entirely the preferences of the vast majority of people. That’s why Apple is successful. It’s also why I have migrated exclusively to Apple products.
The bottom line: most people just want stuff that works. They don’t want to customize it more than putting their own wallpaper on the screen. They don’t want to hack into it or understand how it works. They want to use it, get their activities done, and keep living their lives.
Apple products do this really well. In fact, Siri—the new Apple iPhone 4S’s mechanism for voice interaction—is the opposite of what most geeks say is needed: it will create less interaction with the screen rather than more.
Today, John Gruber of Daring Fireball wrote an article specifically about the iPhone 4S and everything the pundits are saying Apple got wrong. I agree 100% with what he says. I expect the iPhone 4S to be the most popular iPhone ever much to the shock of those who think the screen needs to be bigger or that it needs to have a replaceable battery or LTE networking.
It doesn’t. It’s a great upgrade. I’ll have mine in a week and will be sure to let you know what I think after I’ve had some time with it.
What do you think?
